Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 28, 2025
Published
Jun 6, 2026
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 23 Download : 29

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to assess the time efficiency of the work procedures in the publication of the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) at the Aeronautical Information Service (AIS) of the Indonesian Air Navigation Service Provider Agency. The study was conducted from October 2024 to March 2025 by employing observational methods, open questionnaires, and documentation analysis. Findings indicate that the current publication process utilizes a 28-calendar-day timeframe, which does not accurately reflect the actual working conditions due to limited human resources. The amendment process averages over 100 charts per cycle, peaking at 229 charts, while validation is manually performed by six active personnel. Data submission often surpasses deadlines, shortening processing time. Based on analysis of work stages, interviews, and documentation, an alternative timeframe with an ideal duration of 42 working days (54 calendar days) is proposed. Implementation of this optimization strategy is expected to enhance work efficiency and maintain the quality and sustainability of aeronautical information publication

Keywords

Proses Kerja Publikasi AIRAC Pusat Informasi Aeronautika

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Putra, I. W. D. M., Wagini, D., Wagini, D., & Permatasari, N. A. (2026). Study Of Work Procedures In The Airac System At The Aeronautical Information Center. Jurnal Teknologi Kedirgantaraan, 11(2), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.35894/jtk.v11i2.321
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. J. Heizer dan B. Render, Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management, 12th ed. Pearson, 2017.
  2. International Civil Aviation Organization, “Annex 15 Aeronautical Information Services 16th Edition, July 2018,” 2018.
  3. International Civil Aviation Organization, Doc 8126 Aeronautical Information Services Manual 7th Edition. 2018.
  4. “Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Nomor PR 1 DJPU Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Nomor Kp 234 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Standar Bagian 175-01 (Advisory Circular Part 175-03) Mengenai Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Informasi Aeronautika (Aeronautical Information Service),” hlm. 1–3, 2024.
  5. “Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Nomor PR 2 DJPU Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Nomor Kp 234 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Standar Bagian 175-03 (Manual Of Standard Part 175-03) Mengenai Publikasi Informasi Aeronautika (Publication Of Aeronautical Information),” hlm. 1–3, 2024.
  6. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 2022.
  7. Y. Liu, J. Koopmann, V. Alterman, M. Wang, S. Liu, dan J. Shi, “Duality of Workload in Teams: A Daily Investigation of Team Workload and Team Functioning,” J Manage, hlm., 2024, doi: 10.1177/01492063241289091.
  8. K. Jasberg dan S. Sizov, “Human uncertainty in explicit user feedback and its impact on the comparative evaluations of accurate prediction and personalisation,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 39, hlm. 544–577, 2019, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1604804.
  9. Q. Fu, G. Nicholson, dan J. Easton, “Understanding data quality in a data-driven industry context: Insights from the fundamentals,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 42, hlm. 100729, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2024.100729.
  10. C. Lin dan H. Jia, “Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 20, hlm., 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043205.
  11. J. Fan dan A. Smith, “The Impact of Workload and Fatigue on Performance,” hlm. 90–105, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_6.
  12. A. Y. Dhiya’ulmi, A. Irfani, dan A. R. Assyofa, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Dinas ABC,” Bandung Conference Series: Business and Management, hlm., 2025, doi: 10.29313/bcsbm.v5i1.17037.
  13. N. Shirakura, R. Takase, N. Yamanobe, Y. Domae, dan T. Ogata, “Time Pressure Based Human Workload and Productivity Compatible System for Human-Robot Collaboration,” dalam 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), IEEE, Agu 2022, hlm. 659–666. doi: 10.1109/CASE49997.2022.9926685.
  14. M. Mohammed, D. Mébarek, B. Wafa, dan C. Makhlouf, “Evaluation Method for the Performance of Work Procedures,” Saf Health Work, vol. 7, hlm. 299–306, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.04.007.
  15. J. Bratton dan J. Gold, Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice, 7 ed. Red Globe Press, 2021.
  16. A. Emel’yanovich, S. Koval, dan A. Galimova, “Working Time Management as a Way to Increase Labor Productivity,” Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences, hlm. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.21603/2500-3372-2021-6-2-208-218.
  17. P. Ronquillo-Freire dan M. García, “Measurement of Work as a Basis for Improving Processes and Simulation of Standards: A Scoping Literature Review,” hlm. 77–92, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73100-7_6.
  18. E. Duneva, “Establishing The Abilities of Employees to Manage Working Time in Various Aspects of The Work Process,” Volume 8, Issue 2, hlm., 2020, doi: 10.37708//EP.SWU.V8I2.11.